Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Orthopantomogram»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ Àå°æ ÃøÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON MEASUREMENTS OF TOOTH LENGTH IN ORTHOPANTOMOGRAM

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1994³â 24±Ç 1È£ p.129 ~ 135
Á¤Ã¢ÈÆ, ±èÀç´ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤Ã¢ÈÆ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀç´ö (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐ ±³½Ç

Abstract

ÀúÀÚ´Â »ó,ÇÏ¾Ç ÁßÀýÄ¡, Á¦2¼Ò±¸Ä¡, Á¦1´ë±¸Ä¡ ÃÑ 90°³ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦ Àå°æÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í °¢
Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ Ä¡°ü±³µÎ¿Í Ä¡±Ù´Ü¿¡ ¹æ»ç¼±ºÒÅõ°ú¼º ±Ý¼Ó±¸¸¦ ºÎÂøÇÏ¿© °ÇÁ¶µÎ°³°ñ¿¡ ¸Å½ÄÇÑ ÈÄ ¹æ
»ç¼± ÃÔ¿µÇÏ¿© ¾òÀº orthopantomogram»ó¿¡¼­ Ä¡¾ÆÀå°æÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¶Ç
ÇÑ µÎÄ¡¾ÆÀå°æÀÇ ¼öÁ÷È®´ëÀ²À» »êÃâÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Orthopantomogram»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ Æò±ÕÄ¡¾Æ Àå°æÀº ½ÇÁ¦ Ä¡¾ÆÀå°æº¸´Ù ´õ ±æ°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
2. ½ÇÁ¦ Ä¡¾ÆÀå°æ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ orthopantomogram»ó¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼öÁ÷È®´ëÀ²Àº Æò±Õ 17-26%À̾ú´Ù.
3. »ó¾ÇÀÇ ¼öÁ÷È®´ëÀ²Àº 18-26%·Î ÇϾÇÀÇ ¼öÁ÷È®´ëÀ²17-23% º¸´Ù ´õ ÄÇ´Ù(P<0,01).
4. ÀüÄ¡ºÎÀÇ ¼öÁ÷È®´ëÀ²Àº17-18%·Î ±¸Ä¡ºÎÀÇ ¼öÁ÷È®´ëÀ² 22-26% º¸´Ù ´õ Àû¾ú´Ù
(P<0.01).
#ÃÊ·Ï#
This study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of orthopantomogram by
measuring the actual and radiographic tooth length and by analyzing the vertical
magnification rate.
For this study, total 90 teeth of the maxilla and mandible teeth and a dry skull were
used.
This experiment was attached with metal balls of 1¡¾0.02§® at the root and the crown
cusp tips of central, 2nd premolar, 1st molar of the maxilla and mandible and the teeth
were embedded in dry skull, and then orthopantomogram was taken.
The obtained results were as follows:
1. The average of tooth length in orthopantomogram was longer than that of actual
tooth length.
2. The average of vertical magnification rate in the orthopantomogram to actual tooth
length was 17-26%.
3. Vertical magnification rate of the maxilla teeth was 18-26% and that of mandibular
teeth was 17-23%, and the magnification of maxillary teeth was larger than that of
mandible teeth(P<0.01).
4. Vertical magnification rate of posterior area was 22-26% and that of anterior area
was 17-18%, and the magnification of anterior area was less than that of posterior
area(P<0.01).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸